Australia-wide practise Contact us in NSW, ACT, VIC, QLD, WA and SA No two clients are the same - we see the whole picture, so you get the right outcome. Comprehensive. Personalised. Proven. Our teams are designed and structured to deliver premium, timely, and tailored services to our clients. Premium services Contact Us bqlaw_legal_team

Our Expertise.

Commercial Transactions

Commercial and business contracts, including all related matters such as purchases and sales, leases, licences, and related agreements.

Disputes and Litigation

Resolving disputes and conflicts both in and out of court, including before the Local/Magistrates, District/County, Supreme, and Federal Courts.

Family and Children

Divorce, parenting and property division in the Family Court, care proceedings in the state Children’s Court.

Real Estate

Purchase and sale of real property, including dealings and advice relating to land in NSW, ACT, VIC, QLD and WA.

Notary Public

Advising on company structures, trusts, regulatory and compliance issues, and risk-mitigation strategies.

Corporate Advisory

Advising on company structures, trusts, regulatory and compliance issues, and risk-mitigation strategies.

About Us.

Brennan & Queens, bolstering more than a decade of industrial experience, delivers premium, tailored and strategic advice and solutions to our clients.

We are a nation-wide practice with national presence in all Australian states and cities, and have specialised teams to provide legal advice in corporate and commercial transactions, real estate, litigation, family, estate, and children’s law throughout Australia.

Latest News.

Coles held to have breached Australian Consumer Laws during ‘Down Down’ promotion

On 15 May 2026, the Federal Court of Australia handed down its judgment in the case of Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 598, where Coles has been held to have breached Australian Consumer Laws in its ‘Down Down' promotion by temporarily increasing retail prices of products before placing them on Down Down promotions.

Family Court rejects husband’s purported $4.66 million “family loan”

In Han & Han [2026] FedCFamC1A 54, echoing the decision in Biltoft & Biltoft (1995) FLC 92-614, the Court had refused to deduct the debt from the property pool because a) the alleged creditors had taken no meaningful steps to enforce repayment; b) the evidence about the debt lacked strength; c) the arrangement appeared more “family accommodation” than a commercial loan; and d) the Court was not satisfied that the liability would have realistically been enforced.

Our People

Not sure what you need help with?

Don’t worry, book a time to talk with one of our helpful and friendly solicitors.